Hyvä Checkout
Magento’s heavy Knockout checkout replaced with Hyvä Checkout — the same Tailwind and AlpineJS stack, built around how your customers actually pay.
Hyvä replaces Magento’s Luma frontend with a Tailwind and AlpineJS theme. Ten times fewer front-end dependencies, materially better Core Web Vitals, and a codebase developers actually want to open. It’s my default for every new Magento 2 build — unless you’re locked into PWA Studio or a headless frontend.
A deliberately narrow list. The pieces I ship week in, week out — and charge for with confidence.
Your existing store moved onto a Hyvä frontend, extension by extension — trading the whole way through and launched behind a theme switch.
Magento’s heavy Knockout checkout replaced with Hyvä Checkout — the same Tailwind and AlpineJS stack, built around how your customers actually pay.
New Magento 2 storefronts designed and built on Hyvä from day one, with no Luma debt to carry forward.
Campaign heroes, navigation and CTA blocks your merchandisers assemble themselves, so campaigns go live without a developer.
Every module with frontend output gets a verdict — official compat module, community fallback, rebuild or retire — before a line of theme code is written.
Before-and-after benchmarks on real phones, plus the image, font and script discipline that keeps a Hyvä store green after launch.
Three storefronts, three very different problems: speed, checkout, and brand.
A UK flash-sale retailer traded Luma for Hyvä — and got its speed back.
Pick one, or sequence them. Every engagement starts with an honest read on whether converting beats tuning the Luma store you have.
Your theme, extensions and Core Web Vitals reviewed, with a compatibility map and a real quote for the conversion.
Luma to Hyvä on your existing store, or a move to Hyvä Checkout. Built in parallel and launched behind a theme switch.
A full Hyvä storefront and checkout, with a senior lead embedded in your team from first commit to launch.
Your stack may differ — I meet it rather than fight it.
Extension compatibility is the swing factor. A lean store converts for less than you would expect — a 6–8 week project — while extension-heavy stores need compat work that extends the timeline. The fixed-price frontend audit maps every module and returns a fixed or capped quote, so you decide with a real number, not a range.
Yes, and it is structural, not tuning. Hyvä ships roughly a tenth of Luma's JavaScript and none of its render-blocking dependency chains. Lightweight-frontend rebuilds I have shipped score 100 on desktop PageSpeed and 80 on mobile — numbers I have never seen a tuned Luma store reach, and Hyvä is how I deliver them today.
Most will. The Hyvä ecosystem has official compatibility modules for hundreds of popular extensions, and the audit gives every module in your store a verdict: compatible, community fallback, small rebuild, or honestly not worth carrying over. Stores usually end up running fewer, better extensions after the conversion.
For most merchants, Hyvä. It delivers the performance headless promises without the second codebase, the Node infrastructure, or the double maintenance bill. Headless earns its complexity when you have genuine multi-channel requirements or a large in-house React team. I build both, so you will get a recommendation based on your team, not my preference.
Six to eight weeks for a typical store, longer where heavy extension compatibility or custom checkout work is involved. Your current store keeps trading throughout — the new theme is built and benchmarked in parallel and launched with instant rollback.
Yes — Hyvä supports Adobe Commerce, including B2B features like company accounts and requisition lists. I scope Commerce-specific functionality in the audit so nothing is discovered missing after launch.
It should help it. URLs and metadata are untouched in a theme conversion — what changes is speed, and Core Web Vitals are a ranking signal. Faster templates also render more consistently for crawlers. I benchmark organic visibility before and after, the same as on platform migrations.
Often, yes — image optimisation, critical CSS and JavaScript deferral can move a failing Luma store to passing. The audit tells you honestly whether tuning will get you there or whether you are paying to polish a ceiling that only a new frontend lifts.
Tell me what’s slow. You’ll get a straight answer within one working day — even if the answer is “tune Luma first”.